At a superficial level, biologists split the species based on how they externally look like. They saw that a cat looks different than a dog and they said that cats are a different species than dogs. But is it possible that in the case of humans, this division must be done by internal characteristics ? Given that from an external point of view, evolution considered that having hands and legs is enough, it didn't bother changing the external parts. Instead, it focused on changing the internal parts, like developing intelligence. As such, even though 2 entities (called by the same word "human") might look alike, they might belong to 2 entirely different species. Given the continuous problems that the inferior species designated by the same word "human" keep causing, like wars, economical stagnation, wokeism, totalitarian regimes, should the superior species designated by the same word "human" be acknowledged as being a different species and thus be geographically separated from the inferior species in order to be able to develop their proper civilization without being dragged down by the inferior species ?
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/661997a0-cc03-476d-a091-740a1b358b73n%40googlegroups.com.
