Le 07-août-06, à 22:12, David Nyman a écrit :

> 1) FP1g - primitive 'global' first person entity or context
> 2) FP1i - individual person delimited by primitive differentiation
> (which is agnostic to comp, physics, or anything else at this logical
> level)
> 3) FP2 - narrative references to first persons, as in 'David is a first
> person', an attribution, as opposed to 'David-as-first-person', a
> unique entity.
> 4) TP - third person, or structure-read-as-information, as opposed to
> structure-demarcating-an-entity

OK, I copy this in some file so as to be able to come back on it later.  
  If I comment it here, before the "roadmap-summary",  it will be  
confusing. Still, before I send the "roadmap" I give the correspondence  
for those who have followed your posts and remember my earlier  

FP1g will most probably correspond to the "time/knowledge" modal logic  
FP1i will not be explicitly treated, but can correspond to any  
particular relative implementation of a self-referentially correct  
machine. Then S4Grz will still work, but its arithmetical  
interpretations can vary;
FP2: I do periphrases to talk about it. It is a confusing notion (cf  
Chalmers "delusion"). Mathematically it needs bimodal logics (or just G  
handled with care);
TP:  will correspond to the G and G* logic of arithmetical reference,  
including self-reference. Of course the dissociation of the  
corresponding logics into G and G* (and the non-dissociation of the 1  
person logic S4Grz = S4Grz*, is a key phenomenon which is forced by the  
incompleteness phenomenon. G corresponds to the provable  
self-referential statements and G* will correspond to the true  
self-referential statements. That the set of true statements minus the  
set of provable statements (that is G* \ G) is not empty is due to  
Godel incompleteness.

But there are other hypostases (person pov): the 0-person pov (More or  
less Nagel's pov from nowhere) which can be  just "arithmetical truth"  
with the comp. hyp. It plays the role of the neoplatonist "ONE" in the  
arithmetical interpretation of Plotinus's hypostases.
Then there is the "matter" or "1-plural-pov" where "matter" becomes  
apparent ...

I will try to present a roadmap tomorrow or the day after. In the  
meantime you could consult my SANE paper:
You can also download the UDA slides for reference to its 8 steps  



You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to