On Mon, Dec 01, 2025 at 08:07:14PM -0800, Alan Grayson wrote:
> 
> 
> On Monday, December 1, 2025 at 3:46:40 PM UTC-7 Russell Standish wrote:
> 
>     On Sat, Nov 29, 2025 at 11:13:05PM -0800, Alan Grayson wrote:
>     >
>     >
>     > On Friday, November 28, 2025 at 3:26:03 PM UTC-7 Russell Standish wrote:
>     >
>     > Sorry - I can't make sense of your question.
>     >
>     >
>     > The Axiom of Choice (AoC) asserts that given an uncountable set of sets,
>     each
>     > one being
>     > uncountable, there is a set composed of one element of each set of the
>     > uncountable set
>     > of sets. The AoC doesn't tell us how such a set is constructed, only 
> that
>     we
>     > can assume it
>     > exists. So, in chosing an origin for the coordinate system for a plane
>     say, we
>     > have to apply
>     > the AoC for a single uncountable set, the plane. But there's no way to
>     > construct it. Does
>     > this make sense? AG 
>     >
> 
>     I don't see the axiom of choice has much bearing here. To choose an
>     origin, we simply need to choose one point from a single uncountable
>     set of points. We label finite sets of points all the time - geometry
>     would be impossible otherwise - consider triangles with vertices
>     labelled A,B and C.
> 
> 
> You write "we simply need to choose one point from a single uncountable set
> points", but how exactly can we do that! That's the issue, the construction of
> the coordinate system. In fact, there's no credible procedure for doing that,
> so
> we need the AoC to assert that it can be done. IMO, this is an esoteric 
> issue. 
> For example, we can't just assert we can use the number ZERO to construct
> the real line, since with ZERO we have, in effect, a coordinate system.AG
> 

Rubbish - it is not controversial to pick a set of points from a
finite set of uncountable sets. As I said, we've been doing that since
building ziggurats on the Mesopotamian plain. AoC is only
controversial when it comes to uncountable sets of uncountable sets.

> 
>     Indeed not only would geometry be impossible if we couldn't do this,
>     so would engineering.
>     
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>     Dr Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
>     Principal, High Performance Coders [email protected]
>     http://www.hpcoders.com.au
>     
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email
> to [email protected].
> To view this discussion visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list
> /386f1c2f-928c-4f10-88a6-dc7983f31fbdn%40googlegroups.com.


-- 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Russell Standish                    Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders     [email protected]
                      http://www.hpcoders.com.au
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/aS56_Uv8JZrfBZhG%40zen.

Reply via email to