Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
> Brent meeker writes (quoting SP):
>>> Every physical system contains if-then statements. If the grooves on the
>>> record were different, then the sound coming out of the speakers would also
>> That's not a statement contained in the physical system; it's a statement
>> other similar physical systems that you consider possible. You could as well
>> say, (print "Hello world.") contains an if-then because if the characters in
>> string were different the output would be different.
> I don't see how you could make the distinction well-defined.
That's my point. Counterfactuals are defined relative to some
which we suppose to be possibly different. It's not so much that it's not well
defined, but that it's aribtrarily defined. So I think lz's point about
requiring counterfactuals is the same as saying intelligence is relative to
environment - a view with which I agree. In the case of reproducing organisms
organism/environment distinction is clear. In a simulation it's not.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at