Bruno Marchal wrote:
> Le 25-août-06, à 23:24, 1Z a écrit :
> > AR as a claim about truth is implied by comoputationalism, and is
> > not enough to support the real (=as real as I am) existence
> > of the UD.
> It is you who come up with a notion of real existence.
I am starting with the reality my own existence.
That is an *empirical* fact.
> You are reifying
> I don't know which theory.
That's because it is empirical! Whatever theory explains
or doesn't explain my existence, I exist.
> > AR as a claim about existence is
> > enough to support the real (=as real as I am) existence
> > of the UD, but is not impied by computationalism.
> And my WHOLE point is that it does not have to be that way.
But you don't really address the existence question. You just loosely
assume it is the
same thing as truth.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at