Colin Hales writes:

> I would also predict that a UD reified in our universe would be like
> that...'not much' consciousness (the consciousness of the computer = that
> of which it is made, not that of the program). There are no phenomena
> reified as a result of the UD operating. The only phenomena happening are
> the machinations of the hardware of the UD.
> 
> BTW I am not saying that abstract computation of some sort cannot be
> involved in "artificial general intelligence". What I am saying is that
> "bolted to" the computation are non-negotiable aspects that have to be
> done in real phenomena or the machine will have no phenomenal
> consciousness. The phenomena are of a type found in brain material.
> Conversely the sort of universe that make brain material have
> consciousness is not madeof platomic arithmetical entities.
> 
> In one sense 'comp', I gather, is the claim that computation of an
> abstracted realm-X done in realm-Y can create realm-X phenomena. By
> extension it means 'arithmetic realism' of the classical platonic kind is
> false.

It still isn't clear to me whether you believe it is possible for a digital 
computer 
to be conscious or not.

Stathis Papaioannou
_________________________________________________________________
Be one of the first to try Windows Live Mail.
http://ideas.live.com/programpage.aspx?versionId=5d21c51a-b161-4314-9b0e-4911fb2b2e6d
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---


Reply via email to