Colin Hales writes:

> > Well, of course, we have a phenomenal view. Bu there is no informtion
> > in the phenomenal display that was not first in the pre-phenomenal
> > sensory data.
> 
> Yes there is. Mountains of it. It's just that the mechanism and the need
> for it is not obvious to you. Some aspects of the external world must be
> recruited to some extent in the production of the visual field, for
> example. None of the real spatial relative location qualities, for
> example, are inherent in the photons hitting the retina. Same with the
> spatial nature of a sound field. That data is added through the mechanisms
> for generation of phenomenality.

Are you saying that it is impossible to capture the spatial nature of a sound 
field with recording technology? Specific empirical predictions along these 
lines 
would add weight to your theory.

Stathis Papaioannou
_________________________________________________________________
Be one of the first to try Windows Live Mail.
http://ideas.live.com/programpage.aspx?versionId=5d21c51a-b161-4314-9b0e-4911fb2b2e6d
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---


Reply via email to