I have tried to find material discussing the following idea but have not found any yet so I would appreciate comments.
The idea is based in the description of objects. It was recently pointed out to me as being an aspect of my model by Alastair Malcolm. The idea is presented below and its result appears to be to exclude continuums from universes. Assumptions: 1) There is a list of all possible properties of objects. 2) The list and all its sublists are the descriptions of all possible objects. By Cantor's diagonal argument lists can be no more than countably infinite in length. An object's spacial coordinates are part of its description [its sublist] but because the full list is at most only countably infinite in length there can not be a continuum of spacial coordinates on it. The same would apply to an object's time coordinates. Universes are objects described by sub lists of the full list and consist of sets of other sub lists but as such universes can not contain continuums of spacial or temporal coordinates or continuums of any other property its objects might have. As an aside, in my current model the full list and its sub lists are both description and object. Objects interact by mutually changing just one property - their location on a Physical Reality dimension. The change is just a shifting of boundaries between sublists. Hal Ruhl --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---