Brent, interleaving
--- Brent Meeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

John M wrote:
> Dear Stathis:
> my answer to your quewstion:
>           Of course not!
> There is a belief systems "I" like and there are
the  others I don't.
> I just maintain a (maybe misplaced?) humbleness
that I am not the judge > to decide about the rightness of "mine" and "not
> --------"Mine" is better (not necessarily the
best). <G> --------
> Otherwise I would change it as do many converts,
emigrants. divorcees, > or 'elevated minds' coming to some better

So why do you consider yours better than others; so
that you don't change?
Are you joking, or you cannot take a joking remark?
(The <G> in internet abbreviations means "grin". Hungarian proverb: even a gipsy praises his own horse)

> The exceptional "best" are those of the
fundamentalist fanatics (for > themselves, of course), they don't even 'look' away. > > I liked your 'trappy' question: I used to be a faithful altar-boy, a > reincarnationist, a Ouiji-board addict, a natural scientist (within the > reductionist science-religion of our times in the west) and I changed > lately into a view of totally interconnected complexity of a > deterministically interactive existence. So I have
> Am I biased? you bet.

When a scientist knows his instrument is biased, he
puts in a correction to remove the bias he knows
about.  You seem to just be making a generalization,
like the scientist who says, "All instruments have
some bias; so this one must too."  Without knowing
anything about the bias, it's just the same as
So noted. (However: in my feeble English 'bias' means
'~prejudice' and I have yet to learn about prejudicial
instruments. Unless we accept the "conscious
instrument e.g. a thinking yardstick).  I, as a
Loebian machine, may well be prejudicial).

Brent Meeker

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at

Reply via email to