--- Brent Meeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
John M wrote:
> Dear Stathis:
> my answer to your quewstion:
> Of course not!
> There is a belief systems "I" like and there are
the others I don't.
> I just maintain a (maybe misplaced?) humbleness
that I am not the judge
> to decide about the rightness of "mine" and "not
> --------"Mine" is better (not necessarily the
best). <G> --------
> Otherwise I would change it as do many converts,
> or 'elevated minds' coming to some better
So why do you consider yours better than others; so
that you don't change?
Are you joking, or you cannot take a joking remark?
(The <G> in internet abbreviations means "grin".
Hungarian proverb: even a gipsy praises his own horse)
> The exceptional "best" are those of the
fundamentalist fanatics (for
> themselves, of course), they don't even 'look'
> I liked your 'trappy' question: I used to be a
faithful altar-boy, a
> reincarnationist, a Ouiji-board addict, a natural
scientist (within the
> reductionist science-religion of our times in the
west) and I changed
> lately into a view of totally interconnected
complexity of a
> deterministically interactive existence. So I have
> Am I biased? you bet.
When a scientist knows his instrument is biased, he
puts in a correction to remove the bias he knows
about. You seem to just be making a generalization,
like the scientist who says, "All instruments have
some bias; so this one must too." Without knowing
anything about the bias, it's just the same as
So noted. (However: in my feeble English 'bias' means
'~prejudice' and I have yet to learn about prejudicial
instruments. Unless we accept the "conscious
instrument e.g. a thinking yardstick). I, as a
Loebian machine, may well be prejudicial).
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at