Bruno Marchal writes:> What is correct, and has been singled out by Stathis, is
that comp > eludes the "material implementation" problem, given that we take
all > abstract possible relationship between those objects, and they are all >
well defined as purely number theoretical relations. Note that this is >
something I have tried to explain to Jacques Mallah sometimes ago, but >
without much success. This does not make much sense in ASSA approaches, > but,
like George Levy I think, I don't believe in absolute probability > of being
me, or of living my current "observer moment". Such a > probability can be
given the value one (said George) but it is close of > saying that the universe
is here, which tells us nothing, really. It is > like answering "who are you?"
by I am me".I'm satisfied with this summary. The physical implementation
problem is not a problem when considering abstract machines. Stathis Papaioannou
_________________________________________________________________
Live Search: Better results, fast
http://get.live.com/search/overview
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
