# Re: Evidence for the simulation argument

*Not necessarily. If you draw a diagonal on a square on a computer screen,
it will be made up of a discrete number of pixels despite what Pythagoras'
theorem calculates. Irrational in the real world may just be an illusion.*
I was trying to mark a distance in real world which is irrational according
to a rational unit(Width of pixels), and for such diagonal the distance is
an irrational number, although it might be made up of rational numbers of
another irrational unit (diagonal pixels)
I mean there's some irrational distance out there!

--

Mohsen Ravanbakhsh.

On 3/13/07, Stathis Papaioannou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>  On 3/13/07, Mohsen Ravanbakhsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  *Why?  "Mathematical" means nothing but not self-contradictory.  Sherlock
> > Holmes stories are mathematical.  That doesn't mean Sherlock Holmes exists
> > in some Platonic realm.
> > *
> >
> > Brent,
> >
> > What do you mean by that? I do not get your point.
> > Anyway I do not insist that it should be realizable. But I have examples
> > in which we need them!
> > Consider the use of Pythagoras theorem in nature. There are many cases
> > in which the distance between two points should be irrational.
> >
>
> Not necessarily. If you draw a diagonal on a square on a computer screen,
> it will be made up of a discrete number of pixels despite what Pythagoras'
> theorem calculates. Irrational in the real world may just be an illusion.
>
> Stathis Papaioannou
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at