On 3/19/07, Brent Meeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > Each observer moment lives only transiently and is not in telepathic
> > communication with any other OMs, whether related to it or not. The
> > effect (or illusion) of continuity of consciousness is adequately
> > explained by each OM remembering past experiences. These past
> > experiences need not have happened at all, let alone happened in the
> > remembered order and in the remembered body.
> It seems you are simultaneously asserting that an OM is an isolated,
> experience of one thing and contrarily that it includes memories of past
> experiences.   That makes it a compound.  If an OM can be such a compound
> then it can include memory of which OM was immediately before it and OMs
> will form a chain (as suggested by Bertrand Russell) and define mental
> "time".  Under comp this chain may branch (and merge) but it would not
> include isolated OMs that didn't include memory of a predecessor.

The memories of past experiences are called real memories if they arose in
the usual causally linked fashion, in the same brain. However, in theory
they could be false memories. There is no way to tell, from within a
particular moment of experience, whether remembered moments occurred in the
remembered order or even occurred at all in the real world.

Stathis Papaioannou

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to