Le 09-mai-07, à 09:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> Of course reality doesn't change. The question of map versus > territory is *not* an all or nothing > question. *sometimes* the map equals the territory. Most of the time > it does not. This is an important point where I agree with Marc. With or without comp the necessity of distinguishing the map and the territory cannot be uniform, there are "meaning"-fixed-point, like when a map is embedded continuously in the territory (assuming some topology in the map and in the territory, this follows by a fixed point theorem by Brouwer, which today admits many interesting computational interpretations. Bruno http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
