Günther Greindl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:  > If all of the balls had been 
numbered unambiguously from 1 through
> 1,000,010, the statistical effect produced by Bostrom's ambiguous ball
> 7 would vanish.

Agreed. Also consider another version: do not name the balls in the 
first urn 1 to 10, but with uniform random numbers of the interval 

Then, if you would draw the ball "517012" you would not know from which 
urn it was either.

It is definitely a "labeling" artefact.
  Agreed. 8-)
  Gene Ledbetter

Get easy, one-click access to your favorites.  Make Yahoo! your homepage.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to