I'm going to have to look into the question "has my, or a similar,
question been answered yet" as I honestly don't know for sure.  I
would be really happy if it was answered, in some sense, because
whether or not I answer it, I am still curious about the answer.

Thanks for posting that.

On Mar 22, 7:36 pm, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  My main
> > goal is that I seem to need to show that such a fuzzy set theory, one
> > with a "universal set," is ++consistent relative to ZFC++  or at
> > least
> > prove that that's not possible (ie, prove a generalization of
> > Russell's "paradox").
>
> It is proved in Paraconsistent Logic:
>
>  http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-paraconsistent/#MatSig
>
>       
> _____________________________________________________________________________
> Envoyez avec Yahoo! Mail. Capacité de stockage illimitée pour vos 
> emails.http://mail.yahoo.fr
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to