Hi Bruno, > A pity he does not refer to UDA, given that Bostrom has followed my talk > in Brussels at the consciousness ASSC meeting in Brussels, ...
Sorry to hear that... > where > Chalmers quit the audience at the third step of UDA. Chalmers seemed not > to accept the subjective or first person comp indeterminacy. > And Chalmers should (unless he has changed his mind) to be troubled by Hmm Chalmers ... I am unhappy with his "philosophical zombie"; and his dualism; and with a 100 other of his positions ;-)) > indeed any experiences at all. It is much more plausible to hold that > even if the > universe is the way it now seems to be, we can still influence what > experiences there > are. Since this would be impossible on Unification, we should accept > Duplication.>> > > > This is not an argument, but wishful thinking. Agreed - I found this a strange form of argument. Nick Bostrom can do better. Anyway, I would like to comment on unification/duplication issue but I want to go through your SANE paper before once more, and do not have the time at the moment. I will answer as soon as possible. Cheers, Günther --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
