On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 06:04:25AM -0700, Youness Ayaita wrote: > > > The equivalence principle states that we don't contradict ourselves by > taking the two apparently different roads at the same time. But the > reconciliation of QM and GR might be as difficult as explaining the > concept of observer moments starting from a description of worlds and > vice versa. Since the last step includes (explaining observer moments > out of the ensemble of worlds) a "neurological theory", we can > speculate whether the moment is near when our revolutionary view of > the interdependence of physics and neurology/psychology is needed to > find new physics. >
Very interesting point Youness. I'm still compiling a response to your critique of my appendix D - it may be ready by the end of next week. I have a conference paper due in less than two days, which is absorbing most of my time at present. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- A/Prof Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) Mathematics UNSW SYDNEY 2052 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Australia http://www.hpcoders.com.au ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
