On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 11:37:24AM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> Should I write a reply book, I could entitled it:  "The Physical  
> Universe, the Failed Hypothesis" with the subtitle "How Science shows  
> the Physical Universe does not exist".
> Of course Stenger's goal was not to present an argument in favor of  
> the existence of the Physical Universe. His goal was to present  
> evidence that IF such a universe exists THEN there is no evidence that  
> it has been created by a GOD, and I believe Stenger is mainly right on  
> this account.
> Too bad I don't believe in "Stenger's God" (the physical universe). In  
> that sense I am much more "atheist" than him.

Of course Stenger is fairly profoundly nonplatonist in his views. I
doubt he would accept COMP, for instance.



A/Prof Russell Standish                  Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
UNSW SYDNEY 2052                         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Australia                                http://www.hpcoders.com.au

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to