On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 11:37:24AM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> 
> Should I write a reply book, I could entitled it:  "The Physical  
> Universe, the Failed Hypothesis" with the subtitle "How Science shows  
> the Physical Universe does not exist".
> 
> Of course Stenger's goal was not to present an argument in favor of  
> the existence of the Physical Universe. His goal was to present  
> evidence that IF such a universe exists THEN there is no evidence that  
> it has been created by a GOD, and I believe Stenger is mainly right on  
> this account.
> 
> Too bad I don't believe in "Stenger's God" (the physical universe). In  
> that sense I am much more "atheist" than him.
> 

Of course Stenger is fairly profoundly nonplatonist in his views. I
doubt he would accept COMP, for instance.

Cheers

-- 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
A/Prof Russell Standish                  Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Mathematics                              
UNSW SYDNEY 2052                         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Australia                                http://www.hpcoders.com.au
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to