The “Tegmark's levels” is a pure simplification for the consumption by
laymen. There are no Multiverse levels; it is continuum of the same
concept categorized to some superficial categories. Read the comments
of “Bruno Marchal” in this thread above it illustrates it very well.

On Jul 8, 10:11 am, Brent Meeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tom Caylor wrote:
> > Ronald,
> > Of course the main constraints are your audience, Star Trek fans, who
> > usually like talking about frontiers of physics and even mind/body
> > problem issues etc., but also your own background (I don't know what
> > it is) prompts the audience to adjust their level of attention based
> > on whether they think you are talking about stuff that you might know
> > something about.  Another idea is to key off of a source which the
> > audience is familiar with.  For instance, Michio Kaku
> Larry Krauss
> >wrote The
> > Physics of Star Trek a while ago, and another book called Parallel
> > Worlds, and recently came out with a book called The Physics of the
> > Impossible which you could use as a launching platform and talk about
> > how themultiverserealm might help to think about some of the
> > impossibilities that Kaku writes about, such as teleportation.
> > Tom
> > On Jul 7, 2:14 pm, "Ronald Held" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I am giving a talk on theMultiverseto Star Trek fans in several
> >> weeks. I would appreciate any advice and suggestions, since as of now,
> >> I have an outline based on Tegmark's four levels.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at

Reply via email to