But what is aesthetics the study of? Of beauty? That's it isn't it?  
But how can something as plastic as "beauty" have any kind of terminal  
value that you and I can both share?  Do aesthetic terminal values  
decide where something fits into "aesthetic reality" or something like  
that? By the way, thanks for showing that "artistic intelligence" may  
actually represent a form of scientific understanding, a thought dear  
to my heart.

Kim Jones

On 29/07/2008, at 7:20 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> aesthetics is the real basis of
> intelligence, not Bayesian math, and further that aesthetic terminal
> values are objectively real.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to