Colin Hales wrote:
> Computationalism is FALSE in the sense that it cannot be used to construct a > scientist. > A scientist deals with the UNKNOWN. > If you could compute a scientist you would already know everything! Science > would be impossible. > So you can 'compute/simulate' a scientist, but if you could the science must > already have been done... Why would you say that? Computer simulations can certainly produce results you didn't already know about, just look at genetic algorithms. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
