Brian Tenneson skrev: > Now on to the subject of time. > > If Tegmark is correct and an ultimate structure literally is all of > physical reality, what strikes me is that this ultimate structure > appears quite static. What then is the source of our perceptions of > transition, ie, time? This ultimate structure I presume (safely, I > believe) is constant yet we perceive things to change. Why and how? IOW, > what is the mechanism that converts the static ultimate structure into a > fluid appearance of transition? These questions are still valid even if > the ultimate structure I have in mind is wrong; Tegmark still > hypothesizes that some math structure is all of physical reality. >
If you look at our universe as a 4-dimensional space-time structure, then that structure will be completely static. It is nothing peculiar with that. The time is just a direction in that static structure. -- Torgny Tholerus --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
