I have reread MGA 2 and would like to add the following:

We have the

optical boolean graph: OBG -> this computes alice's dream.
we make a movie of this computation.

Now we run again, but in OBG some nodes do not make the computation 
correctly, BUT the movie _triggers_ the nodes, so in the end, the 
"computation" is performed.

So, with MEC+MAT and ALL NODES broken, I say this:

a) If the OBG nodes MALFUNCTION, but their function is subsituted with 
the movie (on/off), it is conscious.

b) If the OBG is broken that in a way that all nodes are not active 
anymore (no on/off, no signal passing), then no consciousness.

I think we can split the intuitions along these lines: if you assume 
that consciousness depends on activity along the vertices, then Alice is 
conscious neither in a nor in b, and then indeed I see why already MGA 2 
leads to a problem with MEC+MAT.

But if I think that consciousness supervenes only on the correct 
lighting up of the nodes (not the vertices!! -> I don't need causality 
then, only the correct order), than a) would be conscious, b) not, and 
MGA 3 does not work I you take away my OBG (with the node intuition)!


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at

Reply via email to