Steinhardt is supposed to get his book Infinite Flesh published sometime  
soon. His premise is similar to Philosopher, John Leslie, save that Steinhardt  
see clones of ourselves being re-born in alternate universes, though the each  
incarnation is improved over the previous. Leslie is more linear (as am I) 
where  as the deceased continue on, in a pantheistic-spinoza- kind of way, as 
part of  an infinite series of divine minds. Steinhardt teaches at Patterson 
University  in New Jersey, and Leslie retired from University of Guelph in 
is now at  the University of Vancouver in British Columbia, Canada. In both 
cases, I would  surmise, that both scholars, would agreee that, if the Machines 
are  sufficiently, complex; they also can join the humans in the great 
whatever. I am  guessing that if a transhumanist tech breakthrough would extend 
human existence,  life, enjoyment, they too, would choose to stick around.
In a message dated 1/9/2009 3:29:25 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, writes:


> My domain is theology. scientific and thus  agnostic theology.  I 
> specialized my self in Machine's theology.  Or Human's theology once 
> assuming comp. The UDA shows (or should  show) that physics is a branch 
> of theology, so that the AUDA makes  Machine's theology experimentally 
> refutable.
> Will  machines go to paradise?

Some related  work:


Steinhart,  E. (2004) Pantheism and current ontology. Religious Studies 
40 (1), 1 -  18.

ABSTRACT: Pantheism claims: (1) there exists an all-inclusive  unity; and 
(2) that unity is divine. I review three current and  scientifically 
viable ontologies to see how pantheism can be developed in  each. They 
are: (1) materialism; (2) platonism; and (3) class-theoretic  
pythagoreanism.  I show how each ontology has an all-inclusive  unity.  I 
check the degree to which that unity is: eternal; infinite;  complex; 
necessary; plentiful; self-representative; holy. I show how each  
ontology solves the problem of evil (its theodicy) and provides for  
salvation (its soteriology). I conclude that platonism and  
pythagoreanism have the most divine all-inclusive unities.  They  support 
sophisticated contemporary  pantheisms.


Steinhart, E. (2003) Supermachines and  superminds. Minds and Machines 13 
(1), 155 - 186.

ABSTRACT:  If the computational theory of mind is right, then minds are 
realized by  computers. There is an ordered complexity hierarchy of 
computers. Some  finite state machines realize finitely complex minds; 
some Turing machines  realize potentially infinitely complex minds. There 
are many logically  possible computers whose powers exceed the 
Church-Turing limit (e.g.  accelerating Turing machines). Some of these 
supermachines realize  superminds. Superminds perform cognitive 
supertasks. Their thoughts are  formed in infinitary languages. They 
perceive and manipulate the infinite  detail of fractal objects. They 
have infinitely complex bodies.  Transfinite games anchor their social 

Especially  the first paper (concerning Pythagorenaism) is interesting.

Best  Wishes,

**************New news.  Be the first to know what is making 
headlines. (

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at

Reply via email to