On 10 Jan 2009, at 02:26, Kim Jones wrote:

>
>
> On 10/01/2009, at 5:17 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>>
>> I admire too. Kim is courageous.
>> Well, for the tenacity we will see :)
>>
>>
>
> Gee thanks Doctor! I'll try not disappoint you. At the moment I am
> devoting an egregious amount of time to searching for employment as my
> ability to sit and cogitate on Correct Machine Theology will be
> severely curtailed if I don't find a job soon.


Life is not easy. Wish you the best.


>
>
> In the meantime, is there any chance of a bus slogan campaign: "There
> Probably Is a Universal Dovetailer Computing All of Reality.

Too much technical and ambiguous imo. The danger with comp is that a  
slight misunderstanding of it can transform it into a reductionism or  
even a nihilism.




> Now, All
> Of You Theologians, Start Worrying and Start Studying Quantum Physics,
> Computationalism and Modal Logic."

Modal logic is generally considered as an invention of theologian. It  
has been a practical tool for religious metaphysics among Middle-Age  
theologians, especially in Middle East.
You could as well have said "Scientists, Start Worrying to have to  
ReStart the Study of Plato's Theology".
But I am not sure we should start worry people with a subject which  
can so easily give too much metaphysical vertigo.

Take it easy,

Bruno




http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/




--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to