--- On Mon, 2/9/09, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
> good idea to resume UDA again

Bruno, I will post on the subject - but not yet.  I do not want to get 
sidetracked from improving my paper.

> I see you have make some progress on the subject (but not yet on  
> diplomacy, unless your "crackpot" wording is just an affectionate  
> mark: I could be OK with that. Well we will see).

I will admit that diplomacy is not always my strong suit when dealing with 
controversial subjects.

My characterization of it is sincere, not affectionate, though mainly what made 
me say that is that you call it a proof.  It's an argument, not a proof, and 
the argument fails to be convincing.  Now many people make arguments that I 
don't buy and I don't necessarily call those arguments crackpot, but I will if 
they make too-strong claims.

> Welcome back to the list Jacques,

Thanks :)


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to