2009/5/10 ZeroSum <ing...@usa.net>:

> David Lewis' statement cuts to the core of the nature of
> consciousness. If each conscious observer on planet Earth (and let's
> assume the laws of physics don't limit consciousness to humans but
> includes any sentient animal life form) exists in "Many Worlds" (see
> Wiki topic on physicist "Hugh Everett III" at 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugh_Everett)
> then Houston, we've got a problem.
> The human population alone is over 6 billion conscious observers. Each
> observer can cause branching into an unfathomably huge number of
> parallel universes (or perhaps an infinite number). Everyone else, in
> addition to an incomprehensibly large number of people only born in
> some parallel universes, branches into their own parallel universes,
> extrapolating logically from the "Many Worlds" theory. Each one of us
> is essentially forced to consciously exist in parallel universes that
> continue coming into existence as the result of the actions of every
> other conscious observer on this planet. Include conscious non-human
> observers (animal and who knows what else) and Houston, we've got a
> really big problem... or is it really a problem?
> Instead of using this line of thinking to debunk the "Many Worlds"
> interpretation, I think this isn't such a big problem as it initially
> appears.
> For one thing, consider sleep walking.

I don't really understand what the problem is. That there are many
world in the MWI is already a given. Consciousness and quantum
immortality experiments don't create any more worlds than there
otherwise would be. In the multiverse as a whole, only a very small
number of worlds contain versions of you who survived a direct nuclear
blast. In almost all the worlds, you have died.

Stathis Papaioannou

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to