Le 12-juin-09, à 09:31, Bruno Marchal a écrit : > > On 11 Jun 2009, at 21:43, Jesse Mazer wrote: > >> >> >> Ah, that makes sense--I hadn't thought of combining multiple >> universal quantifiers in that way, but obviously you can do so and >> get a meaningful statement about arithmetic that for a mathematical >> realist should be either true or false. > > > Even for just an arithmetical realist. (All mathematicians are > arithmetical realist, much less are mathematical realist. I am not an > arithmetical realist).
Raaah... Sorry. Of course I am an arithmetical realist. I am not a *mathematical* realist (still less a physical realist). With the month of June I have a lot of works to do, and I tend to do it simultaneously. The result is an augmentation of mistakes! I hope you have learned to automatically correct them. Sorry. Please, ask in case of remaining doubt. Bruno http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
