Le 12-juin-09, à 09:31, Bruno Marchal a écrit :

> On 11 Jun 2009, at 21:43, Jesse Mazer wrote:
>> Ah, that makes sense--I hadn't thought of combining multiple 
>> universal quantifiers in that way, but obviously you can do so and 
>> get a meaningful statement about arithmetic that for a mathematical 
>> realist should be either true or false.
> Even for just an arithmetical realist. (All mathematicians are 
> arithmetical realist, much less are mathematical realist. I am not an 
> arithmetical realist).

Raaah... Sorry. Of course I am an arithmetical realist. I am not a 
*mathematical* realist (still less a physical realist).

With the month of June I have a lot of works to do, and I tend to do it 
simultaneously. The result is an augmentation of mistakes! I hope you 
have learned to automatically correct them. Sorry. Please, ask in case 
of remaining doubt.



You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to