Rex Allen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Bruno Marchal<> wrote:
>>> As such, I feel that it is reasonable to say that conscious experience
>>> itself is uncaused and fundamental.
>> This has no meaning for me. It is like saying "don't ask".
> Hmmmmm.  You don't at all see what I'm trying to say?
> Okay, how about this:  Reality is tautological.
> So if our conscious experience is caused by a rule-following system,
> based on a sequence of determinisitc transforms applied to an initial
> state...and this is true of both physicalism and your theory I
> think...then our conscious experience just is what it is.  Tautology.
> Everything that follows was implicit in the setup.
> And there's no obvious reason that the "unpacked" version, where what
> follows is made *explicit*, shouldn't be considered as a whole - with
> the beginning, middle, and end states seen as existing simultaneously
> and timelessly.  This makes the view that "it just is what it is" even
> more obvious.
>> Also, what do your theory say about accepting or not an artificial
>> brain?
> IF consciousness is caused, then whether you accept or not is a
> forgone conclusion, implicit in the initial setup (initial state +
> transformation rules) of the system that caused your conscious
> experience.  So there is no real choice to "accept or decline".  Only
> the conscious experience of a choice.
> If consciousness is UNCAUSED and fundamental, then...same answer.
> There is no real choice to "accept or decline".  Only the conscious
> experience of a choice.
>> More generally, how do you see the relation between brain and
>> conscience?
> Brains only exist as something that we consciously perceive.
> I'm sure that my brain can be viewed as representing the contents of
> my experience.  And I'm sure that a computer program could also be
> written that would represent the contents of my conscious experience
> and whose representational state would evolve as the program ran so
> that it continued to match the contents of my experience over time.
> But this would not mean that the program was conscious, or that my
> brain is the source of my consciousness.
> The living brain and the executing computer program both just
> represent the contents of my conscious experience, in the same way
> that a map represents the actual terrain.

When you set fire to a map the land doesn't burn.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at

Reply via email to