Bruno:
 I have heard of Octonians but have not used them.
I do not know anything about intelligible hypostases
.                       Ronald


On Aug 18, 2:58 am, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
> On 17 Aug 2009, at 16:23, ronaldheld wrote:
>
>
>
> > arxiv.org:0908.2063v1
> > Any comments?
>
> Very cute little paper.
>
> I think the author would have found gravity waves, and thus space-
> time, by extending its approach to the Octonions (I intuit this since  
> my reading of Kaufman book on knots and physics).
>
> Of course, despite apparent mathematicalism, this is still physics,  
> and the computationalist mind body problem is not addressed.
>
> I have independent reason that such an octonionic physical theory is  
> basically right, but to show this with respect to the comp hyp, it is  
> nessary to derive such a theory from the "intelligible hypostases",  
> that is from the correct variant of the provability logic. I can come  
> back on this when more is said on the "intelligible hypostases").
>
> Bruno
>
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to