On 19 Aug, 13:48, David Nyman <david.ny...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 19 Aug, 09:36, Flammarion <peterdjo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > Bruno's position is that only one of the above can be true (i.e. CTM
> > > and PM are incompatible) as shown by UDA-8 (MGA/Olympia).   I've also
> > > argued this, in a somewhat different form.  Peter's position I think
> > > is that 1) and 2) are both false (or in any case that CTM and PM are
> > > compatible).  Hence the validity of UDA-8 - in its strongest form -
> > > seems central to the current dispute, since it is essentially this
> > > argument that motivates the appeal to arithmetical realism, the topic
> > > currently generating so much heat.  UDA-8 sets out to be provable or
> > > disprovable on purely logical grounds.  
> > >I for one am unclear on what
> > > basis it could be attacked as invalid.  Can anyone show strong grounds
> > > for this?
> > Of course, no argument can validly come to a  metaphysical conclusion--
> > in this
> > case, that matter does not exist --without making a single
> > metaphysical assumption.
> > The argument is therefore invalid, or not purely logical
> Again, with respect, you appear to assume that MGA

I was refering to the UDA

>argues that matter
> doesn't exist.  In fact it argues that CTM + PM = false, which is not
> the same thing at all.  It is possible to retain matter as primitive
> (which I for one don't rule out, dependent on a more complete
> understanding of mind-body) whilst relinquishing an a priori


> What would be needed, as I've said elsewhere, would be an alternative
> theory of mind which - like any other 'transcendent' a posteriori
> analysis - would be capable of direct elucidation in terms of of
> primary physical processes.  Bruno has argued separately against the
> plausibility of finding such a theory, but this isn't implicit in MGA,
> David
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to