On 11 Aug, 16:38, David Nyman <david.ny...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/8/11 Rex Allen <rexallen...@gmail.com>:

> Standard physicalism, on the other hand, by banishing self-access from
> its fundamental notions of causal adequacy (though arrogating the
> right to whisk a mysteriously powerless ghost of it back later by
> sleight of intuition) is clearly false (incomplete is the more politic
> term).  

Why can't self-access be existent but non-fundamental?

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to