Rex Allen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Flammarion<peterdjo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> If you can't see into the future, you are going to have to
>>>> make your mind up in the present
>>> Assuming physicalism, my brain will make my mind up for me,
>> Asssuming physcialism, your brain is you and not some external force
>> pulling your strings
> Let me put it this way:
> "Assuming physicalism, my brain will make my brain up for me."
> In other words, assuming physicalism, my brain will do what my brain
> is going to do given that the state of the universe and the laws of
> physics are what they are.
> Assuming physicalism, experience is just an acausal aspect of matter
> and energy. There is no "me" except as a term of convenience for
> particular configurations of matter and energy.
> Physicalism is based on the principle of sufficient reason, under
> which nothing happens that isn't caused.
Quantum mechanics is probabilistic - many events are not caused in the sense of
>The interactions of matter
> and energy are apparently do not have special exceptions for
> consciousness to influence how the system develops. So, under
> physicalism there either is no consciousness (except as a term of
> convenience), or consciousness is epiphenemonal...caused but acausal.
> I'll leave it to you to translate that into terms of "pulling strings".
> Indeterminism doesn't get you any further,
Where are you trying to get? to an immortal soul? a ghost-in-the-machine?
with my mind is what my brain does?
>as it just inserts a
> roll-of-the-dice element into the rules that govern (or describe) the
> evolution of the system along its "time" dimension (whatever time is).
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at