On 1 Sep, 00:46, David Nyman <david.ny...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/8/31 Flammarion <peterdjo...@yahoo.com>:
> >> It's more an attempt to characterise our
> >> metaphysical *situation*: i.e. the intuition that it is enduring,
> >> immediate, self-referential and self-relative. Actually, reflecting
> >> on exchanges with Bruno, I wonder if one might well say that this
> >> position is globally solipsistic.
> > That reads like a contradiction in terms to me
> Etc, etc....
> Peter, I must say that I sometimes find your style of commenting
> unhelpful. Any attempt to set out one's ideas - however inadequate
> the result may be - must rely on some sequencing of thought in which
> an earlier statement may depend on a later. Consequently when you
> interpolate the flow of the narrative with constant expostulations of
> this sort I have to wonder how much time you permit to elapse before
> concluding that what I say must be incoherent, deluded, or simply
Does that mean you gave an explanation of "global solipsism"
>Any of the foregoing might indeed be true, but since I don't
> force you to make comments on what I write, we might both gain more
> from the exercise if you made it more readily apparent that you reach
> your conclusions a little less precipitately.
I think you should be more concerned about the long passages
I am not commenting on. That is becuase I find them completely
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at