On 1 Sep, 11:56, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
> On 01 Sep 2009, at 10:49, Flammarion wrote:
> > Can't matter have processes?
> But in that line of discussion, the question should be: can primary
> matter have processes. You said yourself that primary matter is
> propertyless. How something without property can implement processes,
> with or without qualia?

PM has no essential properties, but is the bearer of all
otther properties. It can implement a computation in just
the same way it can be red.  (Althoguh the combinatin PM+red
is of course not PM. It is only PM as a bare substrate).

> I begin to think that your primary matter is even incompatible with
> physicalism.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to