On 01 Sep 2009, at 23:49, John Mikes wrote:
> I am waiting for your explanatory post(s) and anxiously read some
> several thousand pages with related topics.
I am very pleased to hear this.
> Unfortunately the technical examples and discussing their solutions
> are not much help.
> I cannot extract the now-and-then interlaced text-explanations, even
> if I find them, they relate to the technical discussions, not a
> simple understanding.
To be honest, I have a similar problem.
> Is there a way to catch your theory in a concise, understandable,
> readable TEXT ?
I will try to build a text from the conversation on the list. May be
this will converge to a book. In the meantime, I will perhaps make
some summary of what we have seen so far. Please intervene if things
are unclear. Do you have a problem with the notion of bijection?
I can go slowly, there is no rush. I was hoping to be slow down by
more question from the "non-mathematicians", but I think thy are a bit
If you want to play the role of some candid questioner, you are
> You work a lot on this topic, it is a shame if interested lurkers
> don't get it.
Thank for saying this.
Note that the next five days I have the september exams, so I will be
a bit more busy than usual. I still hope I can make the "antic math"
during that period. Please feel free to ask any question.
Have a good day,
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at