Hello John, On 01 Sep 2009, at 23:49, John Mikes wrote:
> > I am waiting for your explanatory post(s) and anxiously read some > several thousand pages with related topics. I am very pleased to hear this. > Unfortunately the technical examples and discussing their solutions > are not much help. > I cannot extract the now-and-then interlaced text-explanations, even > if I find them, they relate to the technical discussions, not a > simple understanding. To be honest, I have a similar problem. > Is there a way to catch your theory in a concise, understandable, > readable TEXT ? I will try to build a text from the conversation on the list. May be this will converge to a book. In the meantime, I will perhaps make some summary of what we have seen so far. Please intervene if things are unclear. Do you have a problem with the notion of bijection? I can go slowly, there is no rush. I was hoping to be slow down by more question from the "non-mathematicians", but I think thy are a bit to shy. If you want to play the role of some candid questioner, you are welcome. Anyone? > You work a lot on this topic, it is a shame if interested lurkers > don't get it. Thank for saying this. Note that the next five days I have the september exams, so I will be a bit more busy than usual. I still hope I can make the "antic math" during that period. Please feel free to ask any question. Have a good day, Bruno http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
