On 1 Sep, 23:48, David Nyman <david.ny...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1 Sep, 17:46, Flammarion <peterdjo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > time capsules are just what I am talking about. Why would you need
> > anythign more for the specious present than a "snapshop" some of
> > which is out of date?
> Well, as well as the question of what constitutes the qualitative
> character of such snapshots, one might also wonder about the curious
> fact that such 'frozen' capsules nonetheless appear to us as
> possessing internal temporal duration and differentiation.  

Easily explained if perceptual data are "timestamped".

>This seems
> to appeal simultaneously to aspects of both flux and block models of
> time whilst being entirely consistent with neither.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to