On 1 Sep, 23:48, David Nyman <david.ny...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1 Sep, 17:46, Flammarion <peterdjo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > time capsules are just what I am talking about. Why would you need
> > anythign more for the specious present than a "snapshop" some of
> > which is out of date?
>
> Well, as well as the question of what constitutes the qualitative
> character of such snapshots, one might also wonder about the curious
> fact that such 'frozen' capsules nonetheless appear to us as
> possessing internal temporal duration and differentiation.  

Easily explained if perceptual data are "timestamped".

>This seems
> to appeal simultaneously to aspects of both flux and block models of
> time whilst being entirely consistent with neither.
>


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to