Hi Marty,

On 19 Sep 2009, at 02:37, m.a. wrote:

>            I don't really remember what saying yes to the doctor  
> entails.
> If it signifies a willingness to be cloned by computation, shouldn't  
> we be
> saying yes to the Star Trek technician who controls the  
> transporter?   m.a.

I am not sure I have seen the precise technic of Star Trek  
transporter, but if I remember well, the original is always  
annihilated, a bit like in quantum teleportation, which is something  
very different from the classical comp transportation. With this one,  
like with the digital doctor, you are 'read and cut', and then pasted  
somewhere in virtue of your classical machine functioning, at some  
level of description. Saying "yes" to the comp-doctor is a sort of  
quasi operational way to accept the digital mechanist hypothesis. It  
helps to understand how *you* are immaterial relatively to your  
probable neighborhood, given that you could in principle change your  
body every morning. Then you are duplicable, like a piece of software,  
and this leads to the comp indeterminacy.
Eventually you can understand that a digital machine cannot see the  
difference between "reality", "virtuality", and "arithmetic" (with the  
Movie Graph Argument).
Technically, the reasoning goes through even if we are quantum  
machine, despite the fact that they are not clonable, because they  
need only to be "preparable" in the quantum sense, but this is  
something we can go back later.
I don't see how comp can be false without introducing actual infinite  
minds and matters.




You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to