On 22 Sep, 21:29, Quentin Anciaux <allco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/9/22 Flammarion <peterdjo...@yahoo.com>
> > On 1 Sep, 18:14, Quentin Anciaux <allco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > 2009/9/1 Brent Meeker <meeke...@dslextreme.com>:
> > > The level "0" has nothing that can be detected/tested if CTM is true
> > > by a computational observer (us if CTM is true).
> > If a level 0 is part of the standard package of materialism,
> > it is testable because "small world" materialism makes different
> > predictions about
> > what will be observed, particularly WRs, than mathematical
> > many-worlds. To put it another way., the theories are as
> > testable as each other.
> No because computational observer has *no* access to any external thing. If
> you are computational in essence I can run you and give you any input I want
> and you can't rely on your measure to assert anything.

It is very unlikely I would find myself in such a  contrived scenario,
there are many other corners of Platonia I could land in.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to