2009/9/22 Flammarion <peterdjo...@yahoo.com>

>
>
>
> On 22 Sep, 21:29, Quentin Anciaux <allco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 2009/9/22 Flammarion <peterdjo...@yahoo.com>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On 1 Sep, 18:14, Quentin Anciaux <allco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > 2009/9/1 Brent Meeker <meeke...@dslextreme.com>:
> >
> > > > The level "0" has nothing that can be detected/tested if CTM is true
> > > > by a computational observer (us if CTM is true).
> >
> > > If a level 0 is part of the standard package of materialism,
> > > it is testable because "small world" materialism makes different
> > > predictions about
> > > what will be observed, particularly WRs, than mathematical
> > > many-worlds. To put it another way., the theories are as
> > > testable as each other.
> >
> > No because computational observer has *no* access to any external thing.
> If
> > you are computational in essence I can run you and give you any input I
> want
> > and you can't rely on your measure to assert anything.
>
> It is very unlikely I would find myself in such a  contrived scenario,
> when
> there are many other corners of Platonia I could land in.
>

Sure, but you can't have access to level 0 if you are computational, no
matter what you say, it doesn't play a role.

If it does had nothing to the computation (and it does had nothing), I see
no reason to postulate one... to call it propertyless or whatever, it is
useless.



> >
>


-- 
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to