On 24 Sep, 00:45, David Nyman <david.ny...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/9/23 Flammarion <peterdjo...@yahoo.com>:
>
>
>
> >> >>You concluded that the realisation of a computation doesn't
> >> >> cause consciousness.  But did you also mean to imply that nonetheless
> >> >> the realisation of a computation IS consciousness?  If so, why didn't
> >> >> you say so?  And how would that now influence your evaluation of CTM?
>
> >> Would you respond to this please?
>
> > I don't think CTM solves the HP. I don't think CTM contradicts
> > physcialism.
>
> If you don't think CTM solves the HP then presumably you don't hold
> that conscious states supervene on the physical tokens of particular
> computational types.

They might do inexplocably. But the significant point
is that nothing else solves the HP either,


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to