On 25 Sep 2009, at 02:07, m.a. wrote:
> And HP stands for???
I guess it means Hard Problem (of consciousness).
I prefer to use "mind-body" problem (or hard mind-body problem in some
I use also HPC (hard problem of consciousness) to distinguish it from
the HPM (hard problem of matter, which is the problem of existence of
not of primary matter, the nature of matter, where does it comes from,
how to explain matter without postulating it as primitive, etc.
Physicists never address this problem explicitly.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Nyman" <david.ny...@gmail.com>
> To: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 9:50 AM
> Subject: Re: Dreaming On
> 2009/9/24 Flammarion <peterdjo...@yahoo.com>:
> > Another point that has got rather lost here is that
> > tend to be a lot more concerned about cognition than experience, CTM
> > has no trouble explaining how people play chess.
> It hasn't got lost - e.g. two sentences later I said "I have no
> quarrel with the third-person
> notion of computational realisation per se". Nobody has been
> disputing the purely third-person analysis of physical systems in
> computational terms. Under your own definition of mathematical
> formalism, such an analysis is an interpretation of a fundamental
> physical state of affairs that has utility for certain purposes.
> Interpretation of the physical state of affairs "people playing chess"
> in functional terms might be one of them, although this may still beg
> some unresolved questions - e.g. the relevance of consciousness in the
> HP sense to people's ability to play chess.
> > >
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at