In the September'09 issue of The Reasoner

http://www.kent.ac.uk/secl/philosophy/jw/TheReasoner/vol3/TheReasoner-3(9).pdf

Fonseca and Gartner present an argument for a difference between the
first and third person point of view. In the October issue,

http://www.kent.ac.uk/secl/philosophy/jw/TheReasoner/vol3/TheReasoner-3(10).pdf

the argument is being criticized by Erich Rast. I don't find the
argument very convincing since their notion of simulation is too vague.
However, I don't follow the criticism. Could someone help a little bit?

Cheers,
 mirek




--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to