In the September'09 issue of The Reasoner

Fonseca and Gartner present an argument for a difference between the
first and third person point of view. In the October issue,

the argument is being criticized by Erich Rast. I don't find the
argument very convincing since their notion of simulation is too vague.
However, I don't follow the criticism. Could someone help a little bit?


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at

Reply via email to