On 12 Jan 2010, at 20:55, Mark Buda wrote:

On Jan 12, 3:32 am, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
Here's another: Consciousness is computation.

Consciousness is a first person notion.
Computation is a third person notion.

How could those be identified?

How could they be different?

Computation is a third person notion. It can be defined formally in mathematics. Consciousness is a first person notion. Even with comp, especially with comp and some definition, consciousness cannot be defined formally.

You are doing the same category mistake than those who says "brain = mind". Those are different type of notion. You need the physical supervenience thesis to *associate* mind to brain. And with comp, to associate consciousness to computational state(s)/computation, you need a computational supervenience thesis, which is not something easy to define. But we know today it cannot be a 1-1 relation.

I think that there is still a confusion between 1-OM and 3-OM. 1-OM are not just the result of a statistics on the 3-OMs. The failure of the identity thesis prevents any simple relation between 1-OM and 3-OM. Consciousness is an attribute of a person. With comp it needs many 3- OM + some structures. We can try to derive such structure from computer science, + some theory of knowledge (like Theaetetus' one).



You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to