2010/1/15 Rex Allen <rexallen...@gmail.com>: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Stathis Papaioannou > <stath...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> There is no real distinction between the different possibilities you >> mention, but evolution has programmed me to think that I am a single >> individual travelling in the forward direction through time. > > How did evolution do that? By what means? Using what causal powers? > > Evolution can't really be used as an explanation for anything can it? > Evolution is just a useful fictional narrative that helps us think > about what we observe. > > For example, if deterministic physicalism is true, then the initial > configuration of matter at the universe’s first instant, plus the > causal laws that govern the subsequent behavior of this matter as > applied over 13.7 billion years fully determines the current state of > the universe today. > > In this case, there is nothing for evolution to do. It is purely a > description of what we observe, not an explanation of it. The state of > the world is today was fixed by the initial conditions plus the causal > laws of physics. Any explanation for the way you are lies there, not > with "evolution". > > There is no “competition” for survival. There is no “selection”. > Instead, events involving fundamental particles unfold as they must…in > the only way that they can. > > When we say “competition among creatures”, what we really mean is “it > is as though there were competition among creatures”. Because what > really exists are fundamental particles (quantum fields, strings, > whatever), not “creatures”. It is only in our minds that we take > collections of quarks and electrons and form them into creatures. > > Since they aren't fundamental laws, evolution and natural selection > have no causal power. We just speak of them as if they did. > > Further, even allowing for some kind of quantum randomness still > doesn’t give “evolution” anything to do. Though it does muddy the > water a bit. > > Right? Or wrong?
Right, in a sense, but it's like saying a computer does not do what it does due to its programming, it merely obeys the deterministic laws of physics which take it from its initial configuration to its final configuration. Another example: a balloon does not expand because heating the gas inside it causes the pressure to increase, but because the gas molecules are moving faster and impart a greater momentum when colliding with the balloon walls. -- Stathis Papaioannou
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.