Do you see the meaning of physical laws being somehow different
from the programmed laws that simulate an environment?
Yes, I feel that simulated mind is not identical to the real one.
Simulation is only the extension of the mind - just a tool, a "mental
crutch", a pluggable module that gives you additional abilities. For
example, if I had the computation power of my brain sufficient enough,
I could simulate other minds entirely in my mind (in imagination,
whatever) - but these imaginary minds won't be conscious, will they?
In the other words:
1. I accept that computation is a description (the impretaive one) of
reality, like math (declarative) or human language.
2. I don't believe (for now) that it has any meaning (and
consciousness) per se.
I would say that it gets its meaning (interpretation) from you. The
meaning you assign it comes from your internal model of the world you
interact with. This is partly hardwired by evolution and partly learned
from your experience.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at