On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Rex Allen <rexallen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We haven't changed the relative number of Rexs and not-Rexs, we've
> just labeled them with an extra property and then rearranged them
> according to that additional property. They retain their original
> properties though.
> So, we still have a countable infinity of Rexs, and a countable
> infinity of not-Rexs. Who can be placed into one-to-one
> SO...what difference does the "measure" make when deciding, as Carroll
> put it, "which infinity wins"?
To me this sounds very similar to the Tristram Shandy Paradox. Yes? No?
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at