On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 3:08 AM, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:

> You have added the UTM and its variants to the pile. Any of these could be
> just as right as you think COMP is.
> I have no idea about the truth status of Digital Mechanism, except nothing
> in nature suggest it to be false. On the contrary, the main startling
> consequence of digital mechanism (non locality, first person indeterminacy,
> symmetry at the bottom, etc.) are confirmed by the empirical study of
> nature. But I am open to the idea that comp may be false. That is why I
> study it: to show it falsifiable and thus scientific in Popper sense.


The part about symmetry at the bottom being a consequence of mechanism
intrigued me.  How is symmetry at the bottom related to mechanism?



You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to