On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Quentin Anciaux <allco...@gmail.com> wrote: > Euh.. > > I'm sorry but where did I state my belief in the preceeding message ? Where > did I spoke about physicalism ? > > I spoke about "idealist accidentalism" in answer to Bruno who said wrongly > it's been refuted when it's not because well... read the preceeding message.
I did read your preceeding message. And what I got out of it is that if you consistently apply your evaluative criteria, you should conclude that physicalism, platonism, deism, theism, arithmetical realism and all other metaphysical theories that reduce conscious experience to some sort of underlying rule-governed framework are irrefutable and thus valueless. But what are alternatives to rule-governed metaphysical frameworks? Accidentalism, and...what else? Refraining from metaphysical speculation altogether? Rex -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
