I wonder if you read my essay of 2000 "Science - Religion" upon which
Russell wrote in ire:
"Don't you dare calling my science a religion!" expressing similar (almost)
basis - not in the spirit of this list (or your particular stance), but
visualizing what I call 'conventional' science, the figment developed over
the past millennia upon halfway (maybe less) understood and partially
observed phenomena. - I mean 'THAT' efficient and miraculous technology,
what humanity uses as of yesterday.
The only difference I can see as fundamental to your present post is the
application of the word: *" T r u t h "* of which you state: 'there is'. I
think: 'there is not'. There is YOUR truth and MY truth and in our
individual mini-solipsism (Colin) certain aspects may match - giving some
sort of communal belief system in scientific terms as well, so a ('partial')
truth has merits, what many may believe. Or: believe IN.
I find it dangerous to include funding from billionaires into establishing
more credit for the hearsay-based so called 'religions' - there is too much
in the world, without it. It not only stifles free thinking, it may give
justifiction to aberrant behavior, brutality, wars, oppression and hate,
above all the overpopulation of this Earth in the name of a "God-given-SOUL"
(Never mind the animals and the artificial fertilization processes).
I could see a 'difference' between what people call religion vs, what people
call science in the methodology: in the former the hearsay-provided teaching
is *believed in faith -* while in the so called (conventional) sciences the
hearsay of (poorly- maybe mis-understood) observences (by lit and reputable
professors) is belived at face value, sometimes re-checked occasionally by a
methodology based on instruments designed FOR such belief system proper,
applying the (re)trospectively occurring (presumable) results for a
(usually mathematical?) match, as the big 'scientific achievement' and
proof(?), before including them into a faithful belief.
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:47 AM, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
> Thanks Brent. But I am soooo bad in selling and advertizing. I might make
> an attempt because I surely agree we should bring bridges between religion
> and science, although I would say we should not build bridges, but demolish
> instead the artificial wall we have build in between science and religion.
> There is no difference at all between science and religion. Both, when
> separated, are pseudo-science or pseudo-religion. There is truth, and we are
> searching it, that's all. Just that politics and short term goal (power)
> interfere with this.
> On 17 Feb 2011, at 01:02, Brent Meeker wrote:
> Need funding, Bruno? "The Theology of Arithmetic" should be a shoo-in.
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> From this week's Nature re: why some scientists are uneasy with Templeton
>> Opening paragraph:
>> "At the headquarters of the John Templeton Foundation, a dozen
>> kilometres outside Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, the late billionaire
>> seems to watch over everything. John Templeton’s larger-than-life
>> bust stands at one end of the main conference room. His life-sized
>> portrait smiles down from a side wall. His face peers out of framed
>> snapshots propped on bookshelves throughout the many offices.
>> It seems fitting that Templeton is keeping an eye on the foundation that
>> he created in 1987, and that consumed so much of his time and energy.
>> With a current endowment estimated at US$2.1 billion, the organization
>> continues to pursue Templeton’s goal of building bridges between science
>> and religion. Each year, it doles out some $70 million in grants, more
>> than $40 million of which goes to research in fields such as cosmology,
>> evolutionary biology and psychology."
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> <Faith in Science.pdf>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> For more options, visit this group at
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at